next up previous
Next: About this document ... Up: Better limited systematicity in Previous: Better limited systematicity in


Akins, 1996
Akins, K. (1996).
Of sensory systems and the `aboutness' of mental states.
Journal of Philosophy, XCIII:337-372.

Barrow and Tenenbaum, 1993
Barrow, H. G. and Tenenbaum, J. M. (1993).
Retrospective on ``Interpreting line drawings as three-dimensional surfaces''.
Artificial Intelligence, 59:71-80.

Dickinson et al., 1997
Dickinson, S., Bergevin, R., Biederman, I., Eklundh, J., Munck-Fairwood, R., Jain, A., and Pentland, A. (1997).
Panel report: The potential of geons for generic 3-d object recognition.
Image and Vision Computing, 15:277-292.

Edelman and Christiansen, 2003
Edelman, S. and Christiansen, M. H. (2003).
How seriously should we take Minimalist syntax? A comment on Lasnik.
Trends in Cognitive Science, 7:-.
in press.

Hummel, 2000
Hummel, J. E. (2000).
Where view-based theories of human object recognition break down: the role of structure in human shape perception.
In Dietrich, E. and Markman, A., editors, Cognitive Dynamics: conceptual change in humans and machines, chapter 7. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

Hummel, 2001
Hummel, J. E. (2001).
Complementary solutions to the binding problem in vision: Implications for shape perception and object recognition.
Visual Cognition, 8:489-517.

Hummel and Biederman, 1992
Hummel, J. E. and Biederman, I. (1992).
Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition.
Psychological Review, 99:480-517.

Kirschfeld, 1995
Kirschfeld, K. (1995).
Neuronal oscillations and synchronized activity in the central nervous system: functional aspects.
Psycoloquy, 6(36).
available electronically as

Lennie, 1998
Lennie, P. (1998).
Single units and visual cortical organization.
Perception, 27:889-936.

Smith, 2001
Smith, B. (2001).
Fiat objects.
Topoi, 20:131-148.

Shimon Edelman 2003-01-22