Printer-friendly version of http://kybele.psych.cornell.edu/~edelman/Psych-214/week8-3.html

Lecture 8.3      Last modified on Mon Oct 22 09:16:26 2007

Lecture 8.3: concepts

— what everyone knows

— the structure of concepts

— learning concepts

— the computational principles behind concepts


the knowledge basis of common sense



a tangled hierarchy of concepts

A tiny portion of the enormous network of concepts a variant of which resides in every person's memory.

Some of the bottom-level nodes label features, others parts.

The links are dynamic (they depend on past experience and on the current goal context) and are graded rather than all-or-none.

slide 3



two of the many possible uses of cow

Context dependency of concepts:

cow may be categorized both under food and under projectile (to catapult a cow, use a large trebuchet).

slide 4



a cow as a projectile

slide 5



concepts: "vertical" structure

In concept structure, it is possible to distinguish between a vertical dimension, which pertains to the "domination" or inclusion relationships between categories, and a horizontal dimension, having to do with the relationships of concepts that belong to the same category.


Basic level of categorization.

slide 6



concepts: "horizontal" structure

In concept structure, it is possible to distinguish between a vertical dimension, which pertains to the "domination" or inclusion relationships between categories, and a horizontal dimension, having to do with the relationships of concepts that belong to the same category.


Prototypes and the radial structure of categories: cow vs. llama as a farm animal.

slide 7



natural kinds and others

A natural kind: iron.

Something else: game.


Consider for example the proceedings that we call "games." I mean board-games, card-games, ball-games, Olympic games, and so on. What is common to them all? — Don't say: "There must be something common, or they would not be called games" — but look and see whether there is anything common to all. — For if you look at them you will not see something that is common to all, but similarities, relationships, and a whole series of them at that.

Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, 66.

slide 8



concepts: the view from here (Barsalou et al.)

An average between-subjects correlation in concept-related tasks of only 0.50; this in addition to significant within-subject variability over of time (0.80 correlation).

Different groups of subjects (such as faculty and undergraduate students, or people of different ethnicities) yielded distinct patterns of categorization.

Interestingly, members of each group were quite good (and consistent) in assuming the point of view of other groups.

slide 9



concepts: the view from here

— In a study at Emory, faculty and undergraduate students generated graded structures for various categories.

— Across, categories, the average correlation between faculty- and undergrad-generated structure was 0.23.

— However, structure generated by undergrads from the faculty's point of view was identical to that generated by the faculty. Structure generated by faculty from ugrad point of view was very similar to that generated by the ugrads themselves.

— Graduate students were perfect in taking the points of view of both faculty and undergrads.

Barsalou and Sewell (1984)

slide 10



concepts and the causal stucture of the world

A graphical model is a probabilistically annotated graph that represents causal relationships among some variables pertaining to the state of affairs in the world. One type of such model is the Bayes network.

"Hidden" variables cannot be observed directly, only inferred from measurements (M) carried out on the observables.

Bottom left: in this two-node graphical model, the variables A and B are independent (no arc between them).

Bottom center: B depends on A.

Bottom right: A and B are conditionally independent, given C.

slide 11



concepts: an interim computational summary